On the way into work this morning I saw this on the cover of a glossy magazine at a news-agency:

Top 50 Australian Bachelors

Which made me wonder, top 50 bachelors at what? The obvious answer from the available information must be top 50 bachelors at being bachelors. Meaning these guys are so good at being bachelors they either, really like being bachelors, to have perfected bachelorism to the level where a national magazine notices their efforts and reports them, or – and this is a biggie – they’re not fit for feminine company.

Either way, is it possible this magazine is publishing a list of men to be avoided by women looking for a committed relationship?